Prior engagements

I have testified (by expert report, declaration, deposition, and/or trial testimony) in the following matters:

• 1997: Hewlett-Packard Company versus CEO of United Epitaxy Company (Taiwan). Nature: Trade secret misappropriation. Law firm: Morrison & Foerster LLP, Washington DC. Venue: US District Court.

• 1998: Hewlett-Packard Company versus United Epitaxy Company (Taiwan). Nature: Patent infringement. Law firm: Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, Redwood Shores, California. Venue: US District Court for the Northern District of California.

• 2006: Kerr Company versus 3M and Dentsply International Company. Nature: Patent infringement. Law Firm: Woodcock Washburn LLP, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Venue: US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin.

• 2006: Nichia Corporation (Japan) versus Seoul Semiconductor Company (South Korea). Nature: Design patent infringement. Law firm: Foley & Lardner LLP Washington DC. Venue: U.S. District Court for Northern District of California, San Francisco Division.

• 2008: Seoul Semiconductor (SSC) Company LTD (South Korea) versus Nichia Corporation (Japan). Nature: Patent infringement. Law firm: Morrison & Foerster LLP, Palo Alto, California. Venue: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Beaumont Division.

• 2008: Professor Gertrude Rothschild versus Toshiba Company (Japan). Nature: Patent infringement. Law firm: DLA Piper LLP, San Francisco California. Venue: US International Trade Commission (ITC), Washington DC.

• 2008: Honeywell Company versus Cree Company and Lumileds Company. Nature: Patent infringement and Reexamination of patent. Law firms: Paul Hastings LLP, Washington DC and Ingrassia, Fisher & Lorenz P.C., Washington DC. Venue: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division and Reexamination before the USPTO's Patent Trial and Appeal Board.

• 2010: Landmark Screens Company versus MLB Company and Kohler. Nature: Mishandling of a patent application. Law firm: Keker & Van Nest LLP, San Francisco, California. Venue: US District Court for the Northern District of California, San Jose Division.

• 2011: Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. versus Seoul Semiconductor (SSC) Company LTD.. Nature: Patent infringement. Law firm: Latham & Watkins LLP, Washington DC. Venue: US District Court for the Central District of California Southern Division.

• 2011: Jeou-Nan Tseng versus Home Depot USA Inc. and Guangde LEDup Enterprise Inc.. Nature: Patent infringement. Law firm: DLA Piper, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Venue: US District Court for the Western District of Washington at Seattle.

• 2011: Lightpanels Ltd. Company versus Fuzhou F&V Photographic Company. Nature: Patent infringement. Law firm: Locke Lord LLP, New York, New York. Venue: US International Trade Commission (ITC), Washington DC.

• 2012: Osram Company versus LG Company. Nature: Patent infringement. Law firm: Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, Washington DC. Venue: US International Trade Commission (ITC), Washington DC.

• 2012: Osram Company versus LG Company and Samsung Company. Nature: Patent infringement. Law firm: Covington & Burling LLP, Washington DC. Venue: US International Trade Commission (ITC), Washington DC.

• 2013: Chao Tai Electron Co. LTD. versus LEDup Enterprise Inc. and others. Nature: Patent infringement. Law firm: Hunton & Williams LLP, Washington DC. Venue: US District Court for the Central District of California.

• 2013: Nichia Corporation versus Everlight Company and Emcore Company. Nature: Inter Partes Review (IPR). Law firm: Foley & Lardner LLP, Washington DC. Venue: IPR before the USPTO's Patent Trial and Appeal Board.

• 2014: Everlight Electronics Co. LTD. versus Nichia Corporation. Nature: Patent infringement. Law firm: Foley & Lardner LLP, Washington DC. Venue: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, Southern Division.

• 2014: LEDup Enterprise Inc. versus Nicolas Holiday Inc.. Nature: Patent infringement. Law firm: Pendleton, Wilson, Hennessey & Crow, P.C. Denver, Colorado. Venue: US District Court for the Central District of California.

• 2014: Nichia Corporation versus Everlight Electronics Co. LTD.. Nature: Patent infringement. Law firm: Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C. Washington DC. Venue: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division.

• 2015: Cree Company versus Unity Opto Technology, Unity Microelectronics, and Feit Electric Company. Nature: Patent infringement. Law firm: Alston & Bird LLP, Silicon Valley, East Palo Alto, California. Venue: US International Trade Commission (ITC), Washington DC.

• 2015: Honeywell International Inc. versus Cree Inc.. Nature: Inter Partes Review (IPR). Law firm: Arnold & Porter LLP, San Francisco, California. Venue: IPR before the USPTO's Patent Trial and Appeal Board.

• 2015: Honeywell International Inc. versus Cree Inc.. Nature: Patent infringement. Law firm: Arnold & Porter LLP, San Francisco, California. Venue: US District Court for the District of New Jersey.

• 2015: Cree Inc. versus Kingbright Electronic Co. LTD and SunLED Corporation. Nature: Patent infringement. Law firm: Hansen Reynolds Dickinson Crueger LLC, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Venue: U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin.

• 2016: Acuity Brands Lighting Inc. versus Lynk Labs Inc.. Nature: Inter Partes Review (IPR). Law firm: Haynes Boone LLP, Chicago, Illinois. Venue: IPR before the USPTO's Patent Trial and Appeal Board.

• 2016: Godo Kaisha IP Bridge 1 Company versus Broadcom Company and others. Nature: Patent infringement. Law firm: Ropes and Gray LLP, New York City, New York. Venue: U.S. District Court of for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division.

• 2016: TSMC Company versus Godo Kaisha IP Bridge 1 Company. Nature: Inter Partes Review (IPR). Law firm: Greenblum & Bernstein, P.L.C., Reston, Virginia. Venue: IPR before the USPTO's Patent Trial and Appeal Board.

• 2017: Harvard University versus Micron Technology Company. Nature: Patent infringement. Law firm: Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP, Redwood Shores, California.  Venue: U.S. District Court for Massachusetts, Boston; U.S. District Court for Delaware, Wilmington.

• 2017: Seoul Viosys Company versus P3 Company. Nature: Patent infringement. Law firm: Holland & Knight LLP, New York City, New York. Venue: U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York.

• 2017: Nitride Semiconductor Company versus Rayvio Company.  Nature: Patent infringement.  Law firm: Dentons LLP, Palo Alto, California.  Venue: US District Court for the Northern District of California.

• 2018: CRX Tech LLC versus Samsung Electronics Co. LTD. Nature: Patent infringement. Law firm: Arnold & Porter LLP, Los Angeles, California. Venue: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division.

• 2018: Macom Technology Solutions Holdings Inc. versus Infineon Technologies AG. Nature: Patent infringement. Law firm: Perkins Coie LLP Denver, Colorado. Venue: U.S. District Court Central District of California Western Division, Los Angeles.

• 2018: Vizio Inc. versus Nichia Corporation. Nature: Inter Partes Review (IPR). Law firm: Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C., Washington DC. Venue: IPR before the USPTO's Patent Trial and Appeal Board.

• 2018: Lowe's Companies Inc. versus Nichia Corporation. Nature: Inter Partes Review (IPR). Law firm: Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C., Washington DC.  Venue: IPR before the USPTO's Patent Trial and Appeal Board.

• 2018: Ultravision Technologies LLC versus Prismaflex USA Inc. Nature: Patent infringement. Law firm: Womble Bond Dickinson LLP, Winston-Salem NC. Venue: US International Trade Commission (ITC), Washington DC.

• 2019:  Carl Zeiss AG versus Nikon USA Inc.  Nature: Patent infringement. Law firm: Morrison & Foerster LLP, Los Angeles CA. Venue: US International Trade Commission (ITC), Washington DC.

• 2019:  ASM IP Holding B.V. versus Hitachi Kokusai Electric Inc.  Nature: Patent licensing dispute.  Law firm: Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP, Silicon Valley Office, Redwood Shores CA.  Venue: ICDR (International Center for Dispute Resolution), Palo Alto CA.

• 2020: Lighting Science Group Corporation versus Nichia Corporation and others. Nature: Patent infringement. Law firm: Shearman & Sterling LLP, New York, NY. Venue: US ITC, OUII (Office for Unfair Import Investigations), Washington DC. Investigation No. 337-TA-1168.

• 2020: Regents of the University of California versus Amazon, Walmart, Ikea, Target, and others. Nature: Patent infringement. Law firm: Nixon & Peabody LLP, Los Angeles CA. Venue: US ITC, OUII (Office for Unfair Import Investigations), Washington DC. Investigation No. 337-TA-1172.

• 2020: Samsung Electronics versus Acorn Technologies. Nature: USPTO Inter Partes Reviews (multiple IPRs). Law firm: Desmarais LLP, New York NY. Venue: US PTO, Alexandria VA. Case numbers: IPR2020-01183, IPR2020-01182, IPR2020-01204, IPR2020-01264, IPR2020-01205, IPR2020-01241, IPR2020-01206, IPR2020-01279, IPR2020-01207, and IPR2020-01282. 

• 2021: The University of California versus General Electric, Ikea, Home Depot and others. Nature: Patent infringement. Law firm: Nixon Peabody LLP, Los Angeles CA. Venue: US ITC, OUII (Office for Unfair Import Investigations), Washington DC. Investigation No. 337-TA-1220.

• 2021: Tianma Company versus Japan Display Incorporated (JDI). Nature: USPTO Inter Partes Review (multiple IPRs). Law firm: Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, Washington DC. Venue: USPTO, Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Alexandria VA. Case numbers: IPR2021-01029, IPR2021-01057 and IPR2021-01058.

• 2022: Semiconductor Energy Laboratory (SEL) Co. Ltd. versus TCL China Star Optoelectronics Technology Co., Ltd. Nature: Patent infringement. Law firm: Fish and Richardson, P.C., Redwood City CA. Venue: US District Court for the Central District of California, Southern Division. Case number: 8:21−cv−00554−JAK−ADS.

• 2022: Satco Products Inc. versus The Regents of the University of California. Nature: USPTO Inter Partes Review. Law firm: Nixon Peabody LLP, Los Angeles CA. Venue: USPTO, Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Alexandria VA. Case number: IPR2021-00662.

• 2022: Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. versus Bishop Display Tech LLC. Nature: USPTO Inter Partes Review. Law firm: Baker Botts LLP, New York City NY. Venue: USPTO, Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Alexandria VA. Case numbers: IPR2022-00500 and IPR2022-00502.

• 2023: Shimon Maimon versus Lockheed Martin Corporation. Nature: Breach of Licensing Agreement. Law firm: Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, Washington DC. Venue: JAMS ADR (Alternative Dispute Resolution).  Case number: JAMS Ref. No. 1460005932.